Can GMOs Help Feed the World?
The claims about genetically
engineered foods have been quite lofty. Monsanto and other proponents of
biotechnology are fond of saying that genetic engineering is necessary
if the world’s food supply is to keep up with seven billion people and
counting. They claim GE crops produce higher yields, solve pest and weed
problems, are safe for humans and the environment, and are the cure for
world hunger.
As John Robbins writes, if
Monsanto’s true goal is addressing hunger, then their seeds would be
designed to fix the core problems that underlie the hunger issue, such as:[1]
-Able to produce more high-quality protein with increased per-acre yield, without the need for expensive machinery, chemicals, fertilizers or water
-Engineered to favor small farms over larger farms
-Cheap and freely available without restrictive licensing
-Designed for crops that feed people, not livestock
If GE foods were really a viable
way to eliminate world hunger, then meeting these challenges would be a
powerful argument in their favor, would it not? So, what does the science say?
Monsanto gets a failing grade across the board.
With nearly 100 million acres of GE food now
planted worldwide, Monsanto’s crops have yet to do one thing to
alleviate hunger, particularly for the world’s less fortunate. In fact,
most of that acreage is devoted to growing corn and transgenic soybeans
for livestock feed.
GE Crops Produce a Higher Yield … Right?
No—their yield is actually lower. Overall,
research has shown a 5 to 10 percent reduction in yield for GE soybeans
versus the conventional variety. Other GE crops are performing equally
poorly.[2] These
plants are weak, malnourished and fail with the slightest environmental
stress or drought. Agronomists and plant scientists have made far
greater advances in yields with conventional breeding methods than with
GE crops.
The yields of GE cotton have been
particularly abysmal. Scientists have determined that growing GE cotton
in the US can result in a 40 percent drop in income. In India, the
situation is much worse with up to 100 percent failure rates for Bt
cotton, leaving farmers in total financial ruin. According to the
National Crime Records Bureau of India, more than 182,900 Indian farmers
took their own lives between 1997 and 2007 as a result of GE crop
failures—a staggering 46 farmer suicides each and every day.[3]
GE Crops Require Fewer Chemicals … Don’t They?
It turns out that GE crops fail miserably in
this respect too. GE crops actually need more toxic chemicals, not less.
Eighty-five percent of all GE seeds are engineered for herbicide
tolerance—specifically, Monsanto’s “Roundup Ready” cotton, corn, soy,
and canola seeds. As a result, pesticide use has increased dramatically.
Since the introduction of GE crops, more than 120 million pounds of
additional pesticides have been used in the US.[4]
Sixty percent of GE crops are resistant to
weed killers, fueling a dramatic rise in herbicide use—especially
Monsanto’s Roundup, which contains the extremely toxic chemical glyphosate.
Roundup is now used in more than 80 percent of all GE crops worldwide,
and the only one who benefits from THIS is Monsanto. They produce the
seeds that require a massive application of an herbicide that they just
happen to produce. How convenient for them!
Not only are these toxic chemicals being used far too heavily, but they are killing our bees and butterflies, polluting our waterways, destroying our soil, and creating resistant super-weeds and mutant pesticide-resistant insects that we have no way to control.[5]
Mother Nature Hates Monocultures
Studies comparing large mechanized farms to
small farms have shown that small farms doing multiple and succession
plantings are significantly more productive than the monoculture
plantings used in large mechanized farms. A report compiled by about 400
of the world’s top scientists concluded our current agricultural system is unsustainable. We need farming methods that rebuild our ecological systems rather than demolish them. Organic farms consistently produce 80 to 90 percent higher yields than monoculture operations.[6] Genetic “bio-invasion” is the biggest risk organic farmers face today.[7]
Biodiversity is key to a healthy
ecosystem—and therefore a healthy food supply. In a diverse population,
some plants will have natural resistance and will fare better than
others, saving the group as a whole from catastrophe. Poor soil quality
is a serious problem for farmers across the globe. Our soil is depleting
at more than 13 percent the rate it can be replaced due to our
chemical-based agriculture system. Massive monoculture has also resulted
in the extinction of 75 percent of the world’s crop varieties over the
last century.[8]
It can be safely said, then, that GE crops were not developed for the purpose of solving world hunger, but to ensure that everything we eat is owned by them. Their goal is maximum profit.
History has proven that artificially inserted
genes can have unintended and disastrous consequences. The reality is
that GE farming practices are not the solution to world hunger, but
rather the very heart of the problem, virtually guaranteeing future crop
collapses and subsequent famine. Sustainable, biodynamic agriculture is the real solution!
To learn more about GMOs visit the Greenmedinfo.com GMO research guide.
References:
About the Author
Valerie Burke, MSN of Panther Tap is a
certified EFT practitioner in Union, Washington. She has a website
dedicated to helping fellow EFT practitioners and lay people alike
understand EFT and its uses, as well as the growing body of science
behind it. To learn more, simply visit her website here: http://panthertap.com.
Credits: Valerie Burke, MSN, EFT-INT, GreenMedInfo, Guest contributor.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire